home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
Columbia Kermit
/
kermit.zip
/
newsgroups
/
misc.20041116-20060924
/
000028_dkcombs@panix.com_Sun Dec 26 13:30:36 2004.msg
< prev
next >
Wrap
Internet Message Format
|
2020-01-01
|
1KB
Path: newsmaster.cc.columbia.edu!panix!panix1.panix.com!not-for-mail
From: dkcombs@panix.com (David Combs)
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.kermit.misc
Subject: What about that gnu kermit, gkermit (circa 1999)? Usable? OK?
Date: 25 Dec 2004 18:53:45 -0500
Organization: PANIX -- Public Access Networks Corp.
Lines: 28
Message-ID: <cqkui9$guk$1@panix1.panix.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: panix1.panix.com
X-Trace: reader1.panix.com 1104018825 11647 166.84.1.1 (25 Dec 2004 23:53:45 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@panix.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 25 Dec 2004 23:53:45 +0000 (UTC)
Xref: newsmaster.cc.columbia.edu comp.protocols.kermit.misc:15258
Frank:
I've just been downloading (via "pkg-get") some solaris
packages (.pkg), one of which, on a whim, was gkermit.
(1) Presumably, ckermit (sp?) is a lot better, bugs fixed,
features, speed, etc.
So, the question: what do you hear, via grapevine, etc,
about gkermit? (seems to be circa 1999)
(2) I believe that at least for the PC, you *charge*
for kermit -- ie, is not entirely free.
But for unix, ie ckermit, there's no charge.
QUESTION: would you be happy for ckermit to be
available (as a solaris "package") via blastwave?
If you say "yes", then I'll suggest it, and ask
"whoever" to get in touch with you.
Thanks!
David